Noob to M30's

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Scottinva wrote:So the motor is holding up well at 20psi? Had any mechanical issues?
20psi easily seeing 24-26psi at times. On my last pass I felt a vibration from the car like maybe the engine or something, maybe a rocker arm, hoping it not though. Still trapped 135 :lol:
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

T_C_D wrote::banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
Haha Todd I knew you would be excited, showing those 24V guys whats up :lol:

Here's a vid

http://vimeo.com/41675072
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

Glad you kept it together for a few runs but a decent 60ft time would get you into the mid 10s! You must have the fastest m30 powered car on the planet!
Nebraska_e28
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 9064
Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
Location: Council Bluffs, IA
Contact:

Post by Nebraska_e28 »

Great run!

I wonder what this would look like with an auto tranny & hi-stall tq converter.
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

Nebraska_e28 wrote:Great run!

I wonder what this would look like with an auto tranny & hi-stall tq converter.
9.90s
M. Holtmeier
Posts: 3031
Joined: Mar 11, 2007 3:06 AM
Location: Dallas, Texas

Post by M. Holtmeier »

These are the threads I love seeing in the FI section! Nice job!
shocka
Posts: 974
Joined: Mar 12, 2009 4:32 PM
Location: Vancouver, BC

Post by shocka »

Great work Otis, you are an M30 God. :D
Shadow
Posts: 951
Joined: Dec 28, 2008 10:03 PM
Location: USA

Post by Shadow »

10 second m30. Too bad ass. :laugh:


Can we get the log just for fun please?
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Time for a little update. Removed the old manifold and turbo and started fabricating a twinscroll one for the HX55.
Here's some progress.


Image

Image

Image
GI jonas
Posts: 371
Joined: Feb 15, 2012 10:06 AM

Post by GI jonas »

That flange looks familiar ;) good to see it getting put to good use!
Cooperman
Posts: 902
Joined: Apr 17, 2009 11:21 PM
Location: Fayetteville, AR

Post by Cooperman »

:D I can't wait to see how this turns out.
clongo
Posts: 1050
Joined: Nov 21, 2009 10:58 PM
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by clongo »

Looks great Otis! I can't wait to see what this thing puts down with that HX55.
europartconnect
Posts: 124
Joined: Oct 08, 2010 8:09 PM
Location: Richfield, Wi

Post by europartconnect »

Off topic but Otis you need to work with Todd and make a tubular bottom mount that would work with his kits. It would take his kits to the next level and would offer a better option over the log manifold.
foolish
Posts: 432
Joined: Apr 08, 2010 2:21 PM
Location: Western Mass

Post by foolish »

Another off topic Otis but how about making NA headers for the e30 swap....just wishing out loud.
Murfinator
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sep 07, 2007 1:39 AM
Location: ZION - 84032

Post by Murfinator »

europartconnect wrote:Off topic but Otis you need to work with Todd and make a tubular bottom mount that would work with his kits. It would take his kits to the next level and would offer a better option over the log manifold.
Why would he need to work with Todd? Seems to be doing it and doing it well by himself.

I dreamed for a while of a bottom-mount tubular but figured why insist on mounting the turbo in an awkward location adjacent the UCA bushing when it could be top-mounted and more easily serviced and plumbed?

The twin-scroll is going to kick ass. Looking forward to comparing the results. May be building or commissioning a similar manifold in the near future.
Nebraska_e28
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 9064
Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
Location: Council Bluffs, IA
Contact:

Post by Nebraska_e28 »

Otis, any idea on a planned price-point on this new manifold?
chocolatier
Posts: 17
Joined: May 30, 2012 6:55 PM
Location: seattle, wa

Post by chocolatier »

Manifold looks great otis!
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Thanks guys. Just need to add the wastegates.
As far as pricing goes $1800 for anyone interested.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Brad D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by Brad D. »

Wow, that is a bad ass looking manifold.
Shadow
Posts: 951
Joined: Dec 28, 2008 10:03 PM
Location: USA

Post by Shadow »

daaaaaaaammmmm. Did you really need to cut much wheel well out? :shock:
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

Looks good otis, nice work!
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Shadow wrote:daaaaaaaammmmm. Did you really need to cut much wheel well out? :shock:
I'm going to run the wastegate dumps on that side. The turbo itself didn't interfere with wheel well.
M. Holtmeier
Posts: 3031
Joined: Mar 11, 2007 3:06 AM
Location: Dallas, Texas

Post by M. Holtmeier »

:shock:


So, each bank gets thier own wastegate?
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

M. Holtmeier wrote::shock:


So, each bank gets thier own wastegate?
Two is better than one right..? :lol:

Got the wastegates configured, now it's time to bolt it on and redo the down pipe.

Image

Image
Brad D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by Brad D. »

Two wastegates is actually a bad ass way to roll if you truly want a divided pulse manifold.
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Got it started today :banana: Wastegate dump tubes are next on the list along with tying in the signal line to them.


Image

Image
jim325
Posts: 185
Joined: Jul 05, 2010 12:34 PM
Location: South Carolina

Post by jim325 »

any warping issues after all the welding is done?

Manifold looks sexy!
Ken H.
Posts: 1819
Joined: Dec 04, 2006 8:43 PM
Location: Suburban Gomorrah

Post by Ken H. »

Good & Tight wrote:Image
Couple questions here, Otis:
1. Any reason you have left the mounting flange as a single continuous piece for all 6 cylinders?
I understand the concern about having the setup being more or less rigid, but differential heating along the length of the head and between the 6 tubes can lead to a lot of distortion--especially so where the flange is 3/8" more or less and the tubing proper around .060". ISTR reading someplace about it being a Good Idea to have the flanges for each cylinder separated. Not by much, maybe .100", but enough to allow for possible different amounts of expansion when heated to exhaust gas temps.

Which leads to the next question:
2. Do you plan to "ovalize" the holes in the flanges where the exhaust studs come through?
The idea here is to allow the flange to expand under heating and not place lateral shear loadings on the studs themselves. This "ovalizing" isn't a large amount, but sufficient to avoid loading the stud. Gas leakage is avoided by having the usual exhaust gaskets; the "ovalizing" is small enough to have the exhaust stud securing nuts have sufficient area to bear on the flange itself. If one is concerned abouty proiper bearing, an appropriately-sized stainless steel flat washer can be placed on the flange under the copper exhaust stud nut.
turbodan
Posts: 9232
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

The flange runs much cooler than EGT. I'm sure the head soaks up a great deal of heat I'm running a single piece flange and I've had no problems FWIW.
Post Reply